Download Abortion and Social Responsibility: Depolarizing the Debate by Laurie Shrage PDF

By Laurie Shrage

Shrage argues that Roe v Wade's regulatory scheme of a six-month time span for abortion on call for polarized the general public and obscured choices with in all likelihood broader help. She explores the origins of that scheme, then defends another one--with a time span shorter than 6 months for non-therapeutic abortions--that may perhaps win extensive help had to make criminal abortion prone to be had to all girls.

Show description

Read Online or Download Abortion and Social Responsibility: Depolarizing the Debate (Studies in Feminist Philosophy) PDF

Best social policy books

Macroeconomic Consequences of Demographic Change: Modeling Issues and Applications

This publication provides a brand new computational method of fixing large-scale Auerbach-Kotlikoff Overlapping Generations (OLG) types in a complementarity layout. in contrast to with built-in resolution tools, the proposed decomposition set of rules enables the answer of multi-regional and multi-sectoral OLG versions that convey numerous heterogeneous shoppers and numerous household-specific results.

The Necessity of Social Control

As John Bellamy Foster writes in his foreword to the current booklet, “István Mészáros is without doubt one of the maximum philosophers that the ancient materialist culture has but produced. His paintings stands virtually by myself at the present time within the intensity of its research of Marx’s concept of alienation, the structural hindrance of capital, the loss of life of Soviet-style post-revolutionary societies, and the required stipulations of the transition to socialism.

Concepts and Causes in the Philosophy of Disease

This ebook examines a few very important debates within the philosophy of drugs, together with 'what is disorder? ', and the jobs and viability of suggestions of causation, in medical drugs and epidemiology.

Additional info for Abortion and Social Responsibility: Depolarizing the Debate (Studies in Feminist Philosophy)

Example text

In short, the viability time span for nontherapeutic abortions did little either to help women who are socially disadvantaged or to repel criticism of the Court for interfering with the democratic political process. Furthermore, with changes in the medical procedures used for abortions, doctors today face different treatment dilemmas when performing abortions after viability. In particular, because new abortion techniques can eliminate the possibility of live birth, the harrowing treatment dilemmas and professional conflicts Rhoden describes no longer need arise.

Responding to Mary Ann Glendon, who proposes this, Ruth Colker writes: "I do not suggest it as the solution in the United States. "100 Yet Glendon seems to suggest that we adopt not only the regulations but the larger security net as well. She writes: If we are to move from abortion on demand to reimposition of restrictions on abortions in certain situations, we should review the entire complex of laws that bear on maternity and childraising, including but not limited to our welfare and child support laws.

Perhaps Gert is proposing that the state should restrict the abortion method used in cases when there are others willing to care for the fetus and, in cases when there aren't, the state either should not permit a post-viability abortion, or allow the doctor or woman to choose a method not conducive to the fetus's survival. Rhoden's arguments make evident society's need to proscribe nontherapeutic abortions after viability, but they do not fully explain why the government should not ban nontherapeutic abortion before viability.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.61 of 5 – based on 32 votes