Download Explaining the Iraq War: Counterfactual Theory, Logic and by Professor Frank P. Harvey PDF

By Professor Frank P. Harvey

Winner, 2013 Canadian Political technology organization Prize in diplomacy the just about universally approved reason behind the Iraq struggle is especially transparent and constant - the USA selection to assault Saddam Hussein's regime on March 19, 2003 was once a fabricated from the ideological time table, erroneous priorities, intentional deceptions and grand ideas of President George W. Bush and well-liked 'neoconservatives' and 'unilateralists' on his nationwide safety crew. regardless of the common allure of this model of heritage, Frank P. Harvey argues that it continues to be an unsubstantiated statement and an underdeveloped argument with no logical starting place. His publication goals to supply a traditionally grounded account of the occasions and methods which driven the US-UK coalition in the direction of warfare. The research is predicated on either authentic and counterfactual proof, combines causal mechanisms derived from a number of degrees of research and finally confirms the position of direction dependence and momentum as a far better reason behind the series of selections that resulted in conflict. [C:\Users\Microsoft\Documents\Calibre Library]

Show description

Read Online or Download Explaining the Iraq War: Counterfactual Theory, Logic and Evidence Paperback PDF

Best international & world politics books

China's National Defense

China's nationwide protection has continuously been a subject of significant curiosity to readers at domestic and in a foreign country. what's the present point of modernization in nationwide security for China given its speedy fiscal improvement? what's its nationwide protection coverage and what sort of developmental course is China following during this admire?

International Theory: Positivism and Beyond

This publication brings jointly best figures who've made key contributions to the advance of overseas conception to supply a huge survey of the country of the topic. The members study the conventional theoretical methods within the self-discipline, the problems and teams which are marginalized via mainstream idea, and significant new advancements in foreign concept.

Inter-Arab Alliances: Regime Security and Jordanian Foreign Policy

The subject of diplomacy within the Arab international is as advanced because it is critical. Ryan offers the reader the theoretical heritage, and exhibits its direct applicability in the course of the overseas coverage of Jordan. 

The Twilight of French Eastern Alliances, 1926-1936: French-Czechoslovak-Polish Relations from Locarno to the Remilitarization of the Rhineland

Even if France, Poland, and Czechoslovakia have been in jeopardy from a restoration of German energy after international struggle I and from a possible German hegemony in Europe, France failed in her efforts to keep up a method of alliances together with her imperiled pals. targeting the interval from 1926 to 1936, Piotr Wandycz seeks to provide an explanation for how and why those 3 countries, with a lot in danger, missed to behave in live performance.

Additional info for Explaining the Iraq War: Counterfactual Theory, Logic and Evidence Paperback

Sample text

17 At the time, Gore was also issuing statements strongly endorsing regime change in Iraq:18 I’ve made it clear, I’m in favor of a regime change there, of him being removed from power. Now that’s been taken of the table as a goal by the present administration at least formally … I’m sure [Bush and Blair] would still like to see him removed from power, but they’ve removed that as a formal goal. Now I’ve said repeatedly, you know, I think that he needs to be removed. I’ve said that if you’re going ater Jesse James you ought to organize the posse irst, well I think they’ve made good steps in organizing a posse.

He proximity of a Gore victory did not rest exclusively on a few hanging chads in Florida. In the absence Ralph Nader’s candidacy, most informed observers strongly believe Gore would have easily won the 2000 election. Consider some of the numbers in a report by Meyerson et al. (2004): “Nader got 97,488 votes in Florida. Al Gore would have been President had he gotten even 1 percent of those. In New Hampshire, too, Nader’s 22,198 votes dwarfed the 7,211 vote margin by which Bush won the state. In other states, Gore barely dodged Nader’s bullet.

Along with hawkish liberals, they see the War on Terror in the same light as US-led wars against fascism and totalitarianism, and envision the US as a benevolent global hegemon that uses its power to promote democracy. 12 on Tue Oct 09 08:14:58 BST 2012. 11 And in the process of constructing these cases, counterfactual analysis can produce more compelling, historically informed, theoretically grounded accounts of key choices made by Bush and Blair from 2002 to 2003 that set their countries on a path to war.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.84 of 5 – based on 22 votes